logo with masthead



Crosswinds Foundation Newsletter

"Crossing Cultures - Connecting People"

Vol. 9:1

August 19, 2016

Invest In Our Work



In This Issue

Religion and Politics

Culture Tracks

Back Issues

Quick Links


Visit Us Online 

Crosswinds Foundation

CapStand Council

Crosswinds Romania

Crossties Asia


Front Porch Media

Invisible Scars Project


 Social Media

Like us on Facebook

 Visit our blog

Crosswinds Videos 

View our videos on YouTube

Front Porch Videos

View our videos on YouTube 

Bob Waldrep

 Find me on Facebook
 Follow me on Twitter

Linwood Bragan 

Like me on Facebook 

   Eugene Cuevas

Like me on Facebook 

Follow me on Twitter

Dwight Martin

 Find me on Facebook

   Follow me on Twitter  

 Don Malin

 Find me on Facebook
   Follow me on Twitter 

Nelu Filip

   Follow me on Twitter


bob sitting

How important are the gifts we receive?

Without our donors the doors would have been closed a long time ago. And if the doors had closed:


  • None of the thousands of veterans who have received one of our DVDs would have been helped.
  • None of the tens of thousands of people our teams in Romania and Thailand serve would have been reached.
  • None of our films crossing cultural divides would have been made

These ministry opportunities would not have been met without those who invest in this work.


One more quick update, Honoring the Code was released in May and in the first seven weeks of its release over 7,000 free copies were put in distribution for our veterans. This is pretty incredible, especially when considering it took about thirteen months to reach that number with our first film.


Next month we will again join with Eric Horner Ministries in providing copies of our DVDs for the soldiers at Fort Campbell. The last time we participated in this outreach we gave away 2,000 copies of Invisible Scars.


As you can see, your participation in our ministry is much needed. And these are just a few of the ways your investment in the ministries of Crosswinds Foundation will touch many lives, in many places - in the US, in Europe, and in Asia. To continue to expand our reach and impact we need you as part of our team.


Your support is greatly appreciated and will be a source of encouragement for our Board and staff as we continue to grow in ministry.


Please remember to pray for us often.


You can learn more about our outreach to warriors at The Invisible Scars Project website. 




May God Bless,


Bob Signature 

Bob Waldrep


PS. Check out the Crosswinds e-Store.


You will find some great resources at very reasonable prices (most are discounted for you) and U.S. shipping and handling is free. 





We've made online easy. Give directly through your credit card or checking account. You can even set automatic payments and save the postage every time you give. You can even designate your giving to your favorite Crosswind Project or Staff Member? Why not give it a try and see just how easy it is to support our efforts.


We pledge to use your gifts wisely and effectively in helping others.


Click the button below and get started now.




To give by check, make payable to Crosswinds and mail to:


Crosswinds Foundation

P.O. Box 12143

Birmingham, AL 35202





by Bob Waldrep



"Donald Trump came up with a new nickname for Hillary Clinton, 

The Devil.' I like how he says 'it's true,' as if he traveled to

Hell and confirmed it himself."

Jimmy Kimmel


"Members of the conservative Christian clergy met with Donald Trump. They came out of the meeting proclaiming 'THERE IS NO GOD!'"

Conan O'Brien


Late night comedians, like most Americans have grown accustomed to religion and politics being intertwined. Since Jerry Falwell formed the Moral Majority in 1979, aligning followers of the movement with the Republican Party, this has meant Republicans have typically been portrayed as the "Christian" party and Democrats as the anti-Christians. That can be seen in the jokes by Kimmel and O'Brien. However, as we are learning, in this current presidential race the worlds of religion and politics have been turned upside down.


Twenty years ago who would have thought the Republicans would be backing a candidate that doesn't make faith a central part of their campaign while the Democrats are backing a candidate that - when needed - is embracing their faith as a reason for support. In fact, the Republican candidate has seemingly spent more effort on convincing voters that his opponent is not a Christian than convincing them he is a Christian.


Addressing a group of Christian leaders on June 21, 2016, Trump said, "We don't know anything about Hillary in terms of religion...Now, she's been in the public eye for years and years, and yet there's no - there's nothing out there. There's like nothing out there." 1 He made this claim despite the fact that Clinton has realized there is an advantage in presenting herself as the candidate of faith in this election.


For example, while campaigning in Iowa in January of 2016, Clinton was asked about her beliefs and in her comments stated, "I am a person of faith. I am a Christian. I am a Methodist. I have been raised Methodist". 2 While in this instance, she identifies herself as a "Christian", she more often simply refers to herself as a "Methodist" or a "person of faith".


Like Clinton, Trump rarely uses the "C" word, also preferring to identify himself denominationally as a Presbyterian. Consider his answer when asked specifically about his faith in a January, 2015 meeting. The question was posed as to whether he had ever asked God for forgiveness, Trump replied, "I'm not sure I have." He added, "We take, when we go and church, and when I drink my little wine...and have my little cracker, I guess that's a form of asking forgiveness." 3


Even more bizarre, due to answers like that above, the Republican candidate is widely viewed as being a person of little, if any, religious conviction - a large number of Evangelicals doubt he is even a Christian - yet, he still garners much of his support from the religious community. Consider that every candidate he faced in the Republican primary was very verbal about their Christian faith. Each of them openly identified with Evangelicals. Yet, the party known for backing the "Christian" candidate, rallied behind and elected Trump.


"In an exclusive interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network Donald Trump said 'I believe in god.' But of course Donald thought he was talking about himself."

Jay Leno


Meanwhile, the Democratic candidate, who does attest to being a person of faith (and does a much better job of pulling it off), draws much of her support from those who want nothing to do with religion. Polling by the Pew Research Center, released in July, 2016, indicates that 66% of the religiously unaffiliated voters - "those who describe their religion as 'atheist,' 'agnostic' or 'nothing in particular'" would vote for Mrs. Clinton if the election were held at the time of the polling. A 2015 Gallup Poll found that the "religious nones" was the largest religious group among Democrats.


This same Pew poll found that 78% of white evangelical voters say they would vote for Mr. Trump if the election were held today. Incredibly, 44% of these voters also believe Trump is either "not too" or "not at all" religious indicating that, for a large and growing number of Evangelicals, it is no longer mandatory that the Republican candidate be a Christian. What has brought about this change among the Republican "faithful"?


"Donald Trump announced that he's running for president. During

his speech he told the crowd that if elected he would be 'the

greatest jobs president that God ever created.' Then God said,

'Hey, don't drag me into this publicity stunt.'"

Jimmy Fallon


Actually, the handwriting was on the wall during the 2008 election and culminating with the 2012 campaign. In 2008 the Democratic candidate, Barak Obama accused small town Americans of "clinging to their religion and guns" - the implication being that both were not necessarily good for the country. On the Republican side, Mitt Romney was going about getting a great deal of support from those who felt Obama was seeking to disenfranchise - the religious community. However, Romney faced his own religious hurdle in that he was a high-ranking member of the Mormon Church. Most Evangelicals believe the Mormon Church is a cult of Christianity, so they debated among themselves whether they could support a Mormon - who they did not accept as being a Christian - as their nominee. When John McCain won the primary, it became a nonissue - or, did it?


In the 2012 election Romney again threw his hat in the ring. If the 2008 campaign had taught him nothing else, he had learned how to evade the questions about his Mormon faith and beliefs. This time he won the Republican primary and the evangelical community found themselves in a real dilemma as they had to decide if they would stay true to supporting only Christian candidates for President or support the Mormon nominee. They either had to admit they were supporting a person who was not of the Christian faith, or they must find some way to "Christianize" him. Too many chose the latter option and helped Mitt Romney further blur the distinction between Christian faith and the Mormon religion created by its founding prophet, Joseph Smith and the subsequent Church Prophets.


In supporting Romney, Evangelicals made the leap to support a candidate who, despite all the effort to clean him up and make him appear to be one, was not a Christian. Having crossed this line, for many Evangelicals it would now be much easier to embrace a future candidate, such as Trump, who they do not believe to be a Christian without having to try and make him appear as such. In fact, the Pew polling found that Trump's support among Evangelicals is greater than Romney's which was only 73% during the same period in 2012.


During the 2012 campaign we called upon the faith community to recognize the religious pivot that was occurring, writing, "It may be that the days of having a Christian option [in our Presidential campaigns] are becoming rarer...[As such, our support should be] on the basis of why he is the best man for the job, not his being Christian, kind of Christian, or the closest thing to Christian we could find."


It appears that the day of Evangelicals not having a Christian option was much nearer than even we thought when penning those words.


The question might be posed as to why Evangelicals don't simply vote for the Democratic candidate who claims to be a Christian. However, this would be unthinkable since 72% of Evangelicals (2016 Pew Poll) and 49% of those who identify as "very religious" (2014 Gallup Poll) identify with the Republican Party. Since these numbers correspond to the support for Trump, obviously voting for someone highly regarded as a non-Christian is more acceptable than voting for a Democrat.


"Tonight Hillary Clinton gave her big speech at the Democratic Convention, officially accepting the nomination for president.

The speech went well, but the lightning shooting from

her hands was a bit much."

Jimmy Fallon


This shift among Evangelicals to support a candidate who is not a Christian may also be due to, or a reflection of, our views regarding the President and faith. Growing numbers of Americans believe it is unnecessary to have a President who is a person of firm religious convictions. According to Pew's findings only 62% of U.S. adults say it is important for the President to have strong religious beliefs (similarly, a 2014 Pew Poll found 60% believe members of Congress should have strong religious beliefs). This was 67% in 2012 and 72% in 2008 - a decline of 5% with each of the last two presidential terms.


Ultimately, this probably stems from the American public's diminishing evaluation of the effectiveness of the Church. When asked if they think churches, synagogues, and other houses of worship contribute to solving important social problems, only 58% of those polled said they do - either to a great or to some degree. In 2012 this number was 65% and in 2008 it was 75%. A decline from 75% to 58% is quite startling particularly when it occurred in just eight years.


As confidence in the Church wanes so does Church attendance. In 2015 only 36% of Americans attended religious services at least once a week. 30% say they seldom or never attend religious services. Of the religiously unaffiliated, 52% believe religious organizations are too concerned with money and power; 51% believe they focus too much on rules and 48% believe them to be too involved in politics (Pew Research, November 2015).


Without question, Christians should vote and vote for the candidate(s) they believe will be best for the country. However, turning around the numbers regarding the low evaluation of and diminishing participation in the Church will not be accomplished by a presidential candidate or a political party. Positive change will only come as Christians - both Republicans and Democrats alike - learn to again join hands and make our foremost imperative sharing the good news with a culture that desperately needs to hear it. We must strive together to restore the confidence in the Church that has been lost. This will not happen if we cannot first learn to be more graceful in our dealings with fellow Christians, particularly those with whose politics we may disagree.


First of all, then, I urge that entreaties and prayers, petitions and thanksgivings, be made on behalf of all men, for kings and all who are in authority, so that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity. This is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior,who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.

1 Timothy 2:1-4


Foot Notes





Click Image Below to Read the Full Pew Report


Back Issues


Back issues of CrossingCurrents are archived on our website for your convenience.


CrossingCurrents Archives


Please let us know if you have any questions or if we might be of assistance to you. If you would like an information packet on a particiular subject or issue just send us an email, identifying your request, to:





CW logo